sheeting action

**sean connors** · 08-21-2003, 12:49 PM

Good Day All!

I have a customer that is requesting that he wants a shine put on his vehicle that will sheet the water off and not bead.

Any thoughts on a kick a$$ polish, sealant, or wax??

**EBPcivicsi** · 08-21-2003, 12:56 PM

According to Mike Phillips meg`s gold class will sheet as opposed to bead. I remember when I used GC it would sheet, just the durability was questionable. I still think it gives a vehicle a great look.

Boss_429 · 08-21-2003, 12:59 PM

Again, I would agree!

EBP,

You`re getting to fast for me!

**windsor the troll** · 08-21-2003, 03:35 PM

GC always beaded for me, did not last long and was VERY dusty when buffing off.

**CharlesW** · 08-21-2003, 03:39 PM

Originally posted by windsor
GC always beaded for me, did not last long and was VERY dusty when buffing off.

In many instances excessive dust when removing a product is because you applied too much product. Thin coats always work better for me, no matter what the product.

**EBPcivicsi** · 08-21-2003, 04:12 PM

I always found GC to be low-dusting, easy on, easy off. I always applied really thin layers though.

**windsor the troll** · 08-21-2003, 04:12 PM

The dust in GC is lots of "fillers". When applied as directed(thin), it is excessively "dusty".

**EBPcivicsi** · 08-21-2003, 04:23 PM

Fillers? I tend to think of fillers as something that is left behind by a polish like the #9. What makes you feel that the excess dust you have experienced with GC is the result of "fillers"? Not challenging your post, just curious. I guess it is a classic case of "your mileage may vary"